Vasile Gaja: mai 2013

VASILE GAJA

RIGHT ABOUT WHEN... THE END OF OUR WORLD?

PART I: FIZIS - The Material World

Do you think the space is like a jelly that is softening and molding in different shapes?!

That the time is like an elastic band that is expanding and contracting?!

E = mc²?! ?! ?!

PUBLISHED BY A.F. GAJA VASILE, BUCHAREST, 2008

Translation from Romanian by Codruţa Gutman

DTP and proofreading: Anca Gaja

ISBN 978-973-0-05782-9 (for the Romanian version)

To order this book, please contact:

email: vasile.gaja@gmail.com

NOTICE!

We know that matter exists in four states: solid, liquid, gas, and plasma; also that the matter of the Sun is in the state of plasma. We also know that the solid and liquid matter have relatively stable volumes, different from the volumes of the gas state; the last one has its volume depending on various factors, among them the temperature. Since plasma is more gaseous rather that solid, it will also have variable volume.

We know that the Sun from about six billion years is thrusting out matter in all directions, including towards Earth. Well, the obvious question is: once reaching the Earth, what would become of this matter/plasma?

The logical answer would be: since for billion years the Sun, as a veritable spring of plasma, keeps thrusting out matter, pushing it until it reaches the Earth, we should have on Earth a huge amount of layered plasma.

But we do not see that, we have only rocks, dirt, water and others.

But all that matter is not lost on the way; the same principle of matter conservations applies not only in the school laboratory, but also in this huge laboratory we call Universe. So all that matter had to become something somewhere; but not the famous ether, for even though we don’t know exactly what it is, we most certainly know it is not plasma.

However, we know that water vapours through cooling/condensing become water, so why not the plasma pass through a similar condensing process and thus become rocks, dirt, water and others that we see, but not really know where exactly are they coming from.

The condensation phenomenon means also a shrinking of the volume, so it will act as a continuous absorption of plasma; combined with the solar pressure it will assure a continuous process.

This is actually what is happening, and we call this process the Gravitational Attraction; in fact, this is the continuous Solar Pressure combined with the continuous condensation/absorption and thus causing exactly the attraction. The important thing is that this phenomenon can be practically proven.

(If you want more details and find out about other shocking wonders, please read the entire work.)

INTRODUCTION

………………………………………………………………

CHAPTER I

experiment: the rope, the disk

Let’s take a rope, tie at one of its ends a stone and grabbing the other end, spin it above the head. For the experiment to work, let’s assume I have an unlimited force and the rope has an unlimited resistance. I’m spinning it and in the beginning all we can observe is a rotating rope. Assuming I spin faster, at some point all we can see is some sort of semitransparent disk, like the one observed when the propellers of a helicopter are rotating. If I would spin it faster and faster, at some point the observed disk will become to my eyes, lesser and lesser transparent and in the end totally opaque. For our lazy sense of seeing, a rope spinning fast enough – I’m talking about speeds higher than the speed of light - would seem to be “instantaneously” at every position on all the disk radii, thus blocking the light opposite to the observer (us), and so the disk would become opaque.

Here it is, the meeting point to the shepherds’ story: their spoon is the rope “instantly” in all the mouths of the shepherds, i.e. all the disk radii. Let’s see furthermore what this experiment has in store for us.

If the rope would have the necessary internal energy, and would rotate by its own, we would see hover a disk with the ambit and thickness according to the length and thickness of the rope; we would even be able to take it in our hands, without realizing that it is just a spinning rope. These being the facts, let’s try to explain the phenomena.

Because the sensitive inertia of the eye (A/N From the moment an image appears on the retina and the moment the brain becomes aware of it, there is approximately one tenth of a second delay; so even if the eye sees the sliding of the images, the intellect is capable to process only 6 images in a second; it would be enough to switch on and off the light six times in a second. Therefore, it would be enough to switch on and of the light for 6 times in a second in a room for an observer to perceive that the light is permanently on; this principle is used in neon lights and other gas tube lighting. This “false” allows us among other things to have cinema, TV and other applications.), we won’t see a moving rope, but a set of still ropes, like a string of “snapshots” of the same rope, at the same time, on each radius.

Same happens if we take this disk in our hand; the tactile sensitivity is even slower than the visual sensitivity, so the skin won’t feel a set of ropes, but some sort of mass, in other words, the disk.

Here’s an intriguing situation: a rope - with precise measurements - moving fast enough becomes something with a mass!? So, are we somehow creating mass?!

triple reality

So, are we creating mass indeed?!

Yes! My senses are saying that and they are exactly like those of 6 billion people on earth. And since these senses are the only ones we have to perceive our environment, there isn’t any doubt that this disk in my hand has a real mass. But at the same time, if these billions of people would had been assisting to the beginnings of this experiment, they would had sworn that all they could see in the beginning was a spinning rope.

Well, the situation is not only intriguing, but also shocking for contradicting logic: an object cannot be simultaneously in two different hypostases; a rope cannot be simultaneously also a disk.

Yet, both are equally real for the six billion people, since they are aware of what they feel, and also, they cannot deny their rational mind, since they saw from the beginning the spinning rope. Therefore, there is but one conclusion: both realities are equally true; the only difference is how we evaluate them. So, one is the reality we feel, and the other one is the reality we rationally know.

So this experiment shows we are living in a double reality; a reality supported by our five senses, a “sensorial reality”; and a “rational reality”, supported by our knowledge.

But that is not all. We have to admit that both our senses and our understanding are subjected to the restrictions of “the moment”: we use to be protozoa, we are human beings at the moment, and for sure we will be something different in the future, due to the inherent accumulations.

The changing of our environment is causing us to change, and so most likely our abilities will change; not only our abilities to feel, but also our ability to reason, since we understand more than yesterday and obviously less that tomorrow. To conclude, both our “sensory reality” and “rational reality” are “momentary realities”; both are true, but only in the “now”, when we are what we are; we ourselves are “momentary”, since our investigators capabilities are “momentary”.

That is, it means there must be an eternal reality, of the eternal nature, a “material reality” that we continually know through our evolutional capabilities, i.e. an asymptotically cognisable reality. (A/N I could call it subjective reality or objective reality, but since subjective and objective already have their own established meanings (Small Philosophical Dictionary, Political Publishing, Bucharest, 1973; pg. 473 and 544), different of what we are talking about here, I’ll use terms like “sensorial reality”, “rational reality” and “material reality”.) .

So the imaginary “disk experiment” gives a crucial finding: in fact, we are living in a “triple reality”, one of the senses, a second of rationality and a third of matter, permanently virtual. So we have to review our certainties and beliefs, and to really understand our connections with the environment, we must analyse the existence itself through these three perspectives.

Let’s try it step by step!

the mass of the disk - disk mass

So, so far we established that the mass of the disk is created (sensorially speaking) by the movement of the rope; at rest, the rope is simply a rope and the disk doesn’t exist. The experiment showed us that the rope is something and the disk is something else; namely, the rope is the matter creating the disk, and the mass of the disk is the rope/matter moving.

In other words, the disk experiment showed us that the matter and the mass are two different qualities, so we should understand the going confusion between matter and mass (this issue will be discussed in the next chapter).

But back to the shocking question: did we create mass by spinning the rope? The answer is yes, because the spinning of the rope gave our “lazy” senses the illusion of a mass.

We created the mass, but not the actual matter, so we can understand the seriousness of the confusion: mass is not matter itself, but the effect exerted on “our lazy momentary senses” by matter in movement.

Now we can say that the mass is an illusion, a ghost of the matter; more movement causes more illusion, not more matter. (A/N The speed - even the speed of light (!?) would create more “ghost matter”, not more matter).

To conclude, we can say that the dynamic of the rope created the mass of the disk and to generalize, we can also say that the matter becomes perceivable through its dynamics.

the space occupied by the disk - disk space

Throughout dynamics, the disk not only has created mass, but also the “room” – space where it is seen and touched. And if to the previous question we answered “yes!, we created mass”, where the space for the disk to exist came from?

Since this experiment happens in the terrestrial atmosphere, for certain the location where the disk “has embodied” is filled with air, dust, water vapours and some other molecules pushed out by the rope. But at the same time, the rope also pushed away their space, since they all have their own space of existence.

The air molecules, as the other molecules, have been pushed out by the rope, not only with their mass, but also with their spaces; so the disk created its own space.

Therefore, throughout dynamics, the disk created its own mass and its own space to exist in.

mass matter and space matter

So, here is an important observation: it is obvious the disk didn’t take the other’s matter (the disk is not made from dust, but from the rope/hemp), but with the space... that is a different thing. Every grain of dust has its own place and why should the rope take it? The rope just pushed out a little the grain with its room, with its own enclosed space.

It certainly looks that way, but it is not so; the atmosphere is filled with those listed, all with their masses and spaces, all crammed together by their own pressure we call Atmospheric Pressure.

Therefore, what we call atmospheric space is the matter from the air, dust, water vapours and other, or their space. Does anybody see some other space than the space they occupy? Does anybody see besides their spaces an empty unoccupied space? Then why should we imagine an unoccupied space in the atmosphere if there isn’t actually one?

To conclude, at least in our atmosphere there is no such thing like empty space (A/N we will get into details further in the book), so we delude ourselves about the matter and also about the space; they are not material existences but impressions of our limited senses. Thus we can call the atmosphere, filled with matter we cannot sense, “space matter” and the matter we actually feel “mass matter”. So we unify the “material reality” with the “sensorial reality” and the “rational reality” and know which belong to which.

the time of the disk - disk time

The dynamic of the rope gave the mass of the disk and the place for the disk, but they “embodied” only after a certain number of rotations per second. Then and only then our senses perceived the rope as a compact and smooth mass.

So, for the rope to become disk, the rotation of the rope has to have a minimum length of time. This means that this length of time is “the length of time of the disk”. In short, we will call it “the disk time”.

Another important aspect of the experiment is that the rope created the mass, the space and also the time; and it also shows that as there were no mass and space available from somewhere, the same happens with the time. The time is just the temporal measure of a phenomenon; it isn’t something that flows from “minus infinite until plus infinite”, there isn’t time outside the physical phenomenon; it requires a physical phenomenon for the time to exist. Being so, we can no longer say the word time without specifying the physical phenomenon that creates it. So, we will call the necessary time for the rope to become a mass/disk, “the disk time”.

To conclude, through dynamics the rope has created the disk mass, the disk space and the disk time; in short, we can say that through dynamics the matter has created mass, space and time, i.e. “the temporal material space”. To be more specific, from the sensorial and rational investigators point of view, any existence is a dynamic into a “temporal material space”.

the vibrations of the disk - the disk vibrations

We know that the wind blows through the branches, wires and other things, and its whistle is caused by the smashing of the air molecules into various obstacles. If we were to make the experiment, we would had heard at some point a similar noise, a hiss caused by the rope hitting the air. The air molecules also make noise at contact, but since they have way less matter than the rope, their noise is extremely high and out of the range of our hearing ability. (A/N For example, the violin chord produces a higher sound than the double bass chord, because, being thinner, has less matter and it vibrates faster, and hits the air more times; the thicker second chord vibrates slower and consequently produces a lower sound. The number of the collisions per second is called frequency, the effect of collisions is called vibration and the sensation we are aware of is called sound.

We don’t know the frequencies the human ear is capable of perceiving, but we know that the frequencies we are actually aware of are approximately between 18-20000 collisions a second. The lower vibrations are the infrasound and the higher vibrations are ultrasound.).

We will discuss this more on the next chapters, all I will say for now is that the rope-disk would have produced some noise.

In our experiment, in the beginning the lower noise is present due to the rare collisions between the rope and the air molecules; as faster the rope goes, the sound becomes higher until the frequency goes over the audible point and disappears from our awareness.

At this point, the sound is out of the audio range, and after a while it will enter the visible range, because at some rotation/frequency the disk would become mass and have shape. But not only shape, because by becoming mass, it would reflect the light, and so it would acquire also different colours.

“The disk vibrations” are very important, essential for us to become aware of the disk – hear it, see it and touching the contours. But not only that: it can also smell of something and also taste of something, since both smell and taste are vibrations transmitted to the brain. Same happens with everything within our perceptions - the horn, the light bulb, the rose or the honey; all of these reach our senses through their own vibrations. Some propagate through air, some through direct contact with sensorial cells, but through the nerves they can only be transmitted as vibrations. But we will talk about this further.

the disk volume

Finally, we can say that up to a certain spinning speed, the rope transformed in “space matter” – since we can’t see it anymore, then increasing the speed the rope transformed into a disk, i.e. “mass matter”, with specific parameters. In other words, the dynamic transformed the rope - the original matter - into a “temporal material volume” showed as a disk by its “vibrational parameters”.

CHAPTER II

“Dynamic Material Entity” (“DME”)

Now, considering the suggestions by our imagined experiment, we might wonder if there is in the “rational reality” an “absolute material unit” which, like the rope, creates all things into existence, just like the unit “1” is the building block for all numbers. What we know so far is that all things into existence, nature, are made of atoms; the atom is the holder of all matter, energy and initial dynamic; so, the atom is the origin of all existence. But, unlike the rope from our experiment, the atom cannot be the “fundamental material unit”, since has a complex and diverse structure, so it cannot be the “absolute primary structure”. And also, the structure of an atom, the way it is described, is impossible. Let me explain.

the atom

So far, we consider the atom the material energetic unit of all structures. But, according to classical physics, the atom itself is a structure with a nucleus and electrons gravitating around it. The nucleus contains a variable number of neutrons – the material components of the atom - and protons. The energetic components of the atom are the protons – the positive electric charge unit, and the electrons - the negative electric charge unit.

There are two characteristics contradicting the Unit function of the atom: first one is that there are atoms and atoms, they differ in number of protons and also in number of protons-electrons pairs, the second characteristics is that its structure is an impossible one.

Let me tell you my arguments. So the nucleus contains neutrons - neutral particles, “stuffed” together with protons with positive electric charges, so they organically repel each other. Around the nucleus, there are an equal number of electrons, with negative electric charges, also repelling each other; they are bound to the nucleus by the attraction of protons. So the neutrons are at the origin of matter, the protons and electrons are at the origin of energy, and the duality they create is at the origins of the dynamics.

The idea that the dynamics is the result of the attraction between the opposite positron-negatron is very appealing, but somehow seems impossible if you consider the distribution of the particles in the atom. The common sense makes me wonder what force can hold together particles that are naturally repelling. And also, what force prevents the electrons and protons to combine, since they are particles that are naturally attracted to each other? So far, the only logical force existing in the atom is the attraction between minus charge and plus charge. In other words, what force prevents the nucleus to explode and what force prevents the atom to implode? And what is the origin of these forces acting simultaneously and opposite to the attraction between minus and plus?

However, I don’t necessarily want to criticise the classical atom model of Rutherford (A/N Ernest Rutherford, 1871-1937, English physicist, the author of the planetary model of the atom), he deducted very well the spatial model of the primary structure, but everything is perfectible, so that is exactly what I am trying to do, 100 years later. So, we have to admit that the atom is not the “absolute material unit”, not to mention that since it can be decomposed in smaller particles, it is not indivisible (A/N the name “atom” means indivisible in Greek, and it is a name given by Democrit - a Greek philosopher from 3000 years ago).

So, my intention is not to criticize the classical physics, however, since we are not able to explain primary phenomena, I suggest we should adopt a new and more explicit concept; and as the advancement of the knowledge happens, we can replace it.

“Dynamic Material Entity”- “DME”

I suggest another Unit, another Universal Brick. Of course it is a theoretical model; all we can really be sure about, is that there has to be a Unit containing the necessary matter and energy for the dynamic existence to manifest; and this matter and energy have to be inseparable. It is still a duality, and for now we as investigators cannot know its structure, only its manifestations.

Being so, we should stop working the water: it is a material entity – it cannot be otherwise, it is dynamic, meaning it contains energy - it cannot be otherwise, and let’s call it “Dynamic Material Entity”, (“DME”).

Since it is permanently dynamic, let’s imagine this entity in its movement and the most accurate model would be a spatial network, in which the “DME” describes rotating concentric trajectories, swings, precessions and maybe other movements, thus forming from its own concentric trajectories, its own material volume.

Therefore, we can say that “DME” represents the dynamic relationship between matter and energy; that matter is an ongoing/infinite process by which it creates space, mass, time, vibrations, meaning “material temporal volume”.

Finally, I am not saying the “DM Entity” is more accurate than the atom, but it is closer to the “rope model”, and it is a step in the direction of finding the real Unit. So let’s agree for now that it is the Unit, which just like unit “1” is the base for any structure, a Universal Brick.

Before going further, we must underline another aspect, somewhat derivative, but very important: mathematicians say there is no largest number, because if you add another drive, it gets bigger. Now let’s extend the reasoning by saying there is no smallest number, because if we split it once more, we’ll get a smaller one. As a result, the number “1” is the unit of all numbers, but it is a convention that can be divisible.

But mathematics doesn’t operate with material units, but with conventional ones; the mathematical unit is only apparently the numeral equivalent of a material unit; so the mathematical unit is divisible, but the Material Unit “DME” is not; so in a way, mathematics is a self-study of its own reaching imaginary and irrational numbers. (A/N The Pythagorean Theorem for right-angled triangle states that the sum of square length of each leg equals the square length of hypotenuse: 1² + 1² = 2; yet the theorem is valid only for conventional mathematical units which can be divided, not for fundamental units; radical of two fundamental units is impossible. Also, there cannot be built a right-angled triangle from fundamental units, only an equilateral one. Hippasios, a disciple of Pythagoras, pointed out this exception to the master and he agreed.

*Pythagoras –mathematician, philosopher, politician from the island of Samos, 560-500 BC.)

The “DME” process belongs to the “material reality” of course, but being the smallest, lowest possible process and we only can intuit/think its trajectories that form its volume/existence, it stands into the “rational reality”; and since the matter of its trajectories is undetectable, we call it “space matter”.

Although we do not know how a “DME” looks like, we assume its existence, so let’s try to set some parameters. We do not know how it looks like, but from the imaginary rope experiment we can build an image of it.

the amount of a “dme” matter

Being constantly on the move, the most important properties of a “DME” are the dynamic dimensions we will deepen when we will discuss about its volume. Since this is an indivisible unit, we can say that all “DM Entities” have the same matter content and we will call it “Mass Unit”.

the amount of “dme” energy

Regarding the energy, things are by far more complex; after all, we don’t actually know what energy is, the only knowledge we have of it is through the manifestation, the dynamics of things. But since the reality is that everything in the Universe moves, we can safely assume that if the “DME” is the “Matter Unit”, it also must be the “Energy Unit”.

Being permanently dynamic, we could assume that the “DME” has unlimited amount of energy; but that is nonsensical, the smallest material unit cannot contain unlimited amount of energy.

In fact, it is not so: the trajectories of a “DME” continuously collide with other trajectories, implying energy consume. But what a “DME” “loses” throughout a collision, it gains when another one collides with it; the exchange is equal. Thus, through continuous general collisions, the same total amount of energy is taken and given, so that the “energy balance” of all will be the same. Therefore, the energy of a “DME” doesn’t have to be infinite so it can manifest permanently; it is the smallest one, but by not losing anything it can permanently exist.

The “DME” is also a “temporal material volume” created by its trajectories boosted by their own energy; so the energetic relationships take place not only between it and its neighbors, but also with “itself”. So, the energy of a “DM Entity” manifests itself in two ways: one which boosts concentrically its “trajectories”, the cohesion maintaining its existence, we will call it “structural energy”,(“SE”); and one through continuously colliding with its neighbors and through continually exchanging energy, maintaining its existential socket; we’ll call it “relational energy”, (“RE”). So the energy of a “DME” is divided into two different parts/ functions: cohesion and relation with the environment, both with the purpose of preserving its existence.

To conclude, the “DME” is the “Material Unit” and also the “Energy Unit” functioning in an indivisible, indestructible and eternal dualism. That makes it also the “Dynamic Material Unit”.

the vacuum

Given the fact that there is “DME” – the world exists -, we conclude that the two types of energy which assure its existence cannot have any value. The “SE” cannot be 0, without cohesion the cyclic aspect of its trajectories would not exist and so the “DME”. It can take a minimum value – and the counterbalancing “RE” would take a maximum value, and so the path of its trajectories will be as long as its energy allows it; it would be the largest volume ever created by a “DME”. This would be possible only in an environment with lowest density, with the material pressure so low that would allow the “DM Entities” the maximum extension. This environment would have the lowest material pressure, it would be the sparsest “space matter”.

And the audacious question: can there be an environment with even lower pressure? More specifically, is there an environment without “DM Entities”, without matter, i.e. an immaterial environment? The answer is simple: “yes!” there might be one, but only separated between two walls from the material and also the immaterial part. That would be a paradox, something that must be and at the same time must not exist, some sort of “dry water” of “frozen fire”.

However, let’s suppose that since it is an ongoing process, there was a moment in the beginning when the environment was filled with “DME”-s with maximum “SE” and minimum “RE”, and for some reason that still eludes us, the expansion started. From that moment, the values of the two kind of energy started changing and they keep on doing it so. These phenomena are still researched and we traditionally call them Big Bang (expansion) and Red Shift, the ongoing process.

That would mean there is the “material reality”, an environment composed by “space matter” and “mass matter” with their maximum and minimum densities, we call our world. And next to it, around it or elsewhere (the word is improper, since there are only words describing the material manifestations and not words describing the immaterial non-manifestations), there is infinite void and we are dissolving in it.

We will continue the discussion in a later chapter after some preliminary clarifications.

the “dm entity” volume

All “DM Entities” have the same amount of matter and energy, but they differ due to “momentary” different environments; they will have larger volumes in the environments with low pressure, and small volumes in the environments with high pressure. This is explained by the fact that low pressure allows long and scattered trajectories and high pressure allows only short and agglomerated trajectories.

Since pressure is a “momentary factor” (in astronomy it means seconds, centuries, or millennia and so on), the “DM Entities” volumes are different, also momentary and in between specific limits.

We use the notion of “DME” volume only for understanding what we are talking about; this parameter is functional only into the “sensorial reality” where the dimensions are perceivable; into the “rational reality” where its effects take place, the “DME” is in fact only a volume of “space matter”, a “localization of concentric trajectories” completely unperceivable.

relationship between mass and energy

Let’s resume the theory, stating that at the high speeds (of what?) the energy would transform into matter/mass (the current confusion).

We said in small volumes the trajectories of the “DM Entities” are shorter and agglomerated, but it doesn’t mean they transformed in matter (we are not talking about mass, since we are still far from the perceivable dimension); so the trajectories - scattered or agglomerated – are “their” traces, not “their” matter; thus, no matter how big a volume of a “DM Entity” is, its amounts of matter and energy stay the same. In the “rope experiment” more rotations mean more ropes only for our slow senses; in the “material reality” there is only one rope.

So, more trajectories mean more illusion of matter, more ghost matter; for more matter to exist, more “DM Entities” are required. We will discuss more on this issue in the chapter about the structures of the “DME”-s.

the vibrations of a “dme”

On their “trajectories” the “DM Entities” bump into each other and since the collisions can be relatively brutal they can cause temporary distortions; and since they collide continuously, their collisions and recovering from deformations will cause vibrations. Of course, the “DME”-s with shorter and more frequent trajectories will collide more often; it means the frequency of their vibrations will be higher. And since the “DM Entities” are the smallest things into existence, the integral of their collisions will be the vibrations with highest frequencies; usually we call them radiation.

We as investigators recognize and analyze their existence through these frequencies, we evaluate them and the ones from the light spectrum we call colors, the others will be thermic radiation, Roentgen and so on.

So each “DME” has a “momentary existence” in a “momentary environment” and so according to the volume allowed by the environment, has its “momentary vibration/frequency”; this will be its “momentary identity”.

the time for the identity of the “dme”

We understand from the “disk experiment” that time means something lasting, not something immaterial which idly flows from somewhere into somewhere else; that every thing into existence creates its own time, so everything into existence has its own time. And since the building of a “volume of concentric trajectories” of a “DME” takes a certain length of time, it means this is the necessary time for the identity of the “DME” to appear; so this is the “Identity Time” of a “DME”.

Of course, as we already mentioned, the environment being “momentary”, also the volume/identity of a “DME” will be “momentary”; so the time needed to build it up will also be “momentary time”.

the “dme” process

Something important should be emphasized now: the “DM Entity” parameters depend on the “environmental moments” they belong to. In other words, the “DME” is not an eternal fact, but an “eternal dynamic”. So the correct name for it would be the “DM Process”, but to simplify we will keep on calling it “DME”.

“the perennial time of a dme”

When we talk about the duration of a DME, we must distinguish two periods, i.e. two times: the first one is the time needed for a DME to create its specific identity; the second time is the time needed for a DME to preserve its identity. The first one is the “identity time” and the second one is a sequence of “identity times” we call “perennial time”. Since DME is eternal, its “perennial time” is also eternal.

the photon

From the Sun, large amounts of matter and energy are thrust out; the matter is in the form of dust, cosmic dust that we call solar wind, and the energy is in the form of light, thermic and so on radiation.

We can deduct from what we discussed above that cosmic dust is composed of the multitude of free “DM Entities” and the tiny structures they formed, expanding radial along the vectors of the 46.656.000 degrees of the sphere and also along the “infinity” of fractions between those vectors. But we believe that light is a wave energy transmitted by a particle called photon, which is not exactly a particle, since it has no matter. But since we already figured that there is no energy separated by its material correspondent, if we assume the photon transports light, then it necessarily is also matter.

However, in this case would contradict the observed manifestations: being material it cannot propagate like radiation through the cosmic dust, but along with, together with the dust, i.e. it cannot move with the speed of light, but with the speed of matter (slower than the speed of light). And if the photon transports light, it would be bright and the universe will be lightened up by these fireflies, which is not.

And another thing: if the photon would be a particle, a body, moving with the speed of light, it should penetrate the cosmic dust, remove it and so the photons would have to be different: the ones from the stars should be “more tired” than the ones from the desk lamp, the thousands of years road should somehow affect them.

All these show how impossible the concept of photon is. But if we assume that the material part of the “DM Entities” is the cosmic dust and the effect of the collisions of their trajectories is the light, we will have a very different perspective of the phenomenon. And we will understand that the diversity of the radiations - light, thermic, X, Roentgen and others - with different qualities and colors are given by the frequency of the collisions of the trajectories.

radiations

So the Sun thrusts out large amounts of matter and energy: the matter is the cosmic dust, the Solar Wind, and the energy is what we call radiation e.g. light, heat and so on. The Solar Wind and the radiation form “The Solar Stream”.

The cosmic dust consisting of material volumes expands, and so an entire environment moves eccentrically under the pressure given by the continual solar flares. Of course the radiation travels in the same direction, but not moving with it, but through it. So we can say that the matter of the Solar Wind is for the radiation like an avenue. And if every type of radiation would have its “bearer” – like the photon for the light, the multitude of radiation would look like a bright stream of “firefly photons”, ”burning thermions” and others similar. But as we know, “the Solar Stream” is not bright or hot or else, since it doesn’t contain photons, thermions, roentgens, but “DM Entities” moving in order.

The radiation from the Sun resulted from the violent collisions in the Sun (the Solar matter or plasma is composed also from “DM Entities”, since they are the smallest things into existence) propagates from “DME” to “DME” like the energy through the balls from the physics textbook (A/N you remember the experiment with the suspended and in contact steel balls - the first ball gets the impulse and the last one reacts, since the energy of the collision propagates through the sequence of balls without seemingly affecting the intermediary balls), and manifests only when they actually reach the retina or the skin or other receptors.

Now let’s go back to the audacious question from the subchapter “vacuum”: is there an immaterial environment?

As we see the light of the Sun and the stars, it means it reaches us. So there is a “material avenue” through which it propagates. It is the “stellar stream” itself, characteristic for all the stars. So the answer is: there is no such thing like immaterial environment, cosmic void, because if it were to exist, we would not be able to see the stars, the Sun, the Moon. So the Universe is not like a big Swiss cheese with empty holes, the “holes” are actually filled with “space matter”.

the movement of the “dm entities”

Now we understand that the matter from “the Solar Stream” moves in front with a certain speed given by the continuous pressure of the solar flares. But the Sun also spins, so “the Solar Stream” will spin too. So it will move in two ways: the expansion itself, and a continuous eccentric rotation describing a material spiral. Of course the travel speeds will be different: one we can calculate it by the length of time and the other by the opening angle.

the propagation of the radiation

For now, we are interested in the path of the radiation and not the speed. Since the energy/radiation moves through the matter of “the Solar Stream” and this is rotating, undoubtedly this rotation has an influence on the propagation of the radiation; it will bend the path of the radiation. So the light from the Sun is not linear but curvilinear, we see it as a curve, almost a spiral.

In these circumstances, of course the propagation time is different, and so we can say that the propagation speed of the light is relative; so the propagation velocity measured by Michelson (Albert Abraham Michelson, 1852-1931, American physicist) between four hills it is different from the speed of light between the Earth and the Moon measured by lasers, and also different from the ones from the Sun and from the stars. The differences might not be too big, maybe are even insignificant, but important for the phenomenon and for the sake of accuracy.

We can also compare the way the energy of the radiation propagates through the cosmic dust with the way the electric current propagates through the atoms of the wires. So allow me to say that just as the electric energy moves from the electric plus to the electric minus through the matter of the wires, so the energy of the radiations moves from the energetic Solar plus to the energetic interstellar minus/deficit through the matter of “the Solar Stream”. So along with the concept of Solar Wind, we should accept the concept of a “Solar Current”.

the infinity

We talked about the Universe and we explained that it is a body filled with “space matter” and “mass matter”; let’s try to imagine how big it would be, to see how it actually is and the concept of infinity.

It is said that “matter is infinite in space and time”, i.e. the Universe would have and infinite amount of matter in an “infinite amount of time”. The statement, however, is in contradiction with itself: the statement “is” looks like “now, today”; so the Universe “is” quantitative and temporal infinite; or this doesn’t make any sense: is “yesterday’s infinity” different that “today’s infinity”?!

If we would say that the Universe is a temporal material process manifesting without stopping, that would be something different.

The word INFINITE cannot even be used, since it cannot be simultaneously true grammatically and logically; it cannot be subject since it doesn’t have predicate, and from the same reason it cannot also be adjective. Therefore, the term is awkward, and to step out of the “verbal vortex”, let’s say that the concept is an agreement by which we mean the immeasurable.

But we can look at it this way: remember that in school we were told that there is no largest number, since however big may be, we can always add a unit and so it becomes even bigger... and so on. Remember we talked about something similar when we were talking about the smallest unit, now back to the biggest.

So there isn’t such thing as the largest number and the arguments are valid, however the investigators which handle quantities need precise definitions. It is true the conventional mathematics operates with abstractions like irrational numbers, imaginary numbers etc, but not in physics; here the numbers express accurate material quantities; we use them to calculate the dynamics of real characteristics, not imaginary ones; it means functionality, and not virtuality.

Different quantities mean different names and there it is a problem; there is no longer an issue of how many numbers can actually exist, but how many names of numbers we can memorize; this is the true dimension of the problem.

As they say, the human brain would have billions of neurons; therefore, if we identify a neuron as a cell memory, we would have several billions of memory locations, meaning we would memorize billions of names. It is not exactly like this, but it doesn’t really matter; the important thing is that no matter how many neurons our brain has, it is still a limited number, so the last neuron would be occupied with the last number. So we found the biggest number and at the same time the infinity edge.

They also say that the whole Universe is into the human brain as a figure of speech, meaning “all is one and one is all”. Beautifully told and I’m inclined to believe that it is true, if by mind we understand some kind of library containing all the laws of the Universe; not exactly like the books on the shelf, juxtaposed and superimposed.

It would be really interesting if they were connected throughout their logical dynamics, starting from the dynamics of a “DME” till the dynamics of the Universal Organisms.

Finally, because of the habit of it, we will keep using the word infinite instead of immeasurable, although it is grammatically and logically incorrect.

CHAPTER III

the structurings of a “dm entity”

the structuring of a “dm entity”

Certainly, any material existence is a “DME” or a composition of them; their “spatial trajectories” create their volume, which is “space matter” if they are imperceptible, or “mass matter” if they are perceptible. Undoubtedly, they integrate between them; the things into existence prove this, but why they integrate may seem mysterious. If we consider that “DM Entities” are like “balls of crammed concentric trajectories” that keep spinning, we can imagine that similar assemblies with compatible parameters can “weave” their trajectories forming a bigger ball, a new structure.

They are definitely crammed all together; this is certain, since they evolve into a full Universe and they are constantly in contact. Then their “specific vibrations” make them compatible. These “vibrations” can have harmonic frequencies interfering as multiples or submultiples, as waveforms compatible for the “weaving” of trajectories.

If we make another imaginative effort, we could see the “gear trajectories” as elastic serrate wheels spinning among other serrate wheels in an eternal rotation. Now let’s ask ourselves why would the serrate wheels grate, since their teeth fit by height, pitch etc., why would they not spin coupling together in a larger spatial aggregate? If they have compatible frequencies and waveforms, and the continuous environment pressure crams them together, why would they not interlock? From this point of view, forming a new “gear” is not only natural, but mandatory, and it is obvious since the environment is filled with structures.

To conclude, we can say that environmental pressure and “vibrations” with resonant frequencies require the “DM Entities” coupling in new structures.

Finally, my model may violate imagination and does not compare with the model offered by atomic structure, even though as I mentioned above, this structure is more a theoretical than a practical one.

We’ll get into more details further, but first of all we have to mention something very important about the place and time we are in, as we do our analysis.

material and temporal middle of universe

As I said, the “DME” evolves under the environment treat - the packed Universe - and dependant of this it will build its volume and parameters in a continuous process.

This requires a specification: “DME”-s are each a “volume of concentric spatial trajectories”, but if we look at them as processes, we can call them “material/temporal volumes”, their trajectories are of course material, but also temporal, since they are in continually changing.

And all this happens in the Universe, which is the largest “material/temporal volume”. On the other hand we, as the investigators, are also “temporal/material volumes” living in the same Universe. The question is where and when is our “process” integrated on the “temporal material parabola” of the Universe.

We cannot accurately respond to this question, but we can agree on something. Since we cannot accurately know the exact moment of the beginning of the Universe (if there is a beginning) and also when the Universe will end (if it will end), let’s say that in this century, at this hour, at this very moment we speak we are actually witnessing one of the infinite “moments” of the Universe. We call Orion, Solar System, Earth, street, number and the place we are at the moment “matter”, since that is what it is: one of the infinite material places. But since we don’t know where is our “temporal material parabola” on the “temporal material parabola” of the Universe, let’s agree that NOW and HERE is “the temporal material middle of the Universe”. All this is conventional, so we can have a general reference point.

Now let’s talk about structures.

imperatives of structuring

As I said, the environmental pressure, combined with compatible parameters of “DM Entities”, make them interlock like the serrate wheels and thus structuring into a “volume of concentric trajectories”; let’s go back to this phenomenon and try to explain it.

So we are in “the material/temporal middle of the Universe”, on a planet belonging to the Solar System and obviously everything is continually changing; what was yesterday it is not today and it will not be tomorrow, which only means that the “DM Entities” are continually “assembling”.

The environment is full of all sorts of complex structures, so it means that the “DM Entities” with “resonant trajectories” are compelled to “aggregate/integrate” in more and more complex structures. Then we can say the continuous “integration” is a “material imperative” manifesting right from the “DM Entities”. (A/N There is also the oxidation/burning phenomenon which shows disintegration, the opposite of integration; but this is part of an overall process we will discuss in the following paragraphs; for now, let’s just say the complexity of the existing structures show that on Earth the integration is predominant and the complementary disintegration takes place in the Sun, in the stars. Indisputably the dominant characteristic of “terrestrial dynamics” is “integration” and it starts right from “DME”, the original place of the “complementary trajectories”.).

But there is also another imperative.

the solar stream as an imperative for structuring

There is a constant bombardment on the environment – the whole Earth - of energetic material from “the Solar Stream”; at some point it became excessive and destabilizing for the terrestrial environmental harmony. “The Solar Stream” is composed of free “DM Entities” with “vibrations”, frequencies and different shapes. The terrestrial environment also is composed of “DM Entities” with different shapes and frequencies; the resonating entities from the Solar Stream and from the Earth under the “material imperative” coupled and formed new and more complex structures.

And now, here there are two “imperatives” that contribute to structuring: “the material imperative for harmonic structuring” existing in every “DME” and the matter and energy of “the Solar Stream”; both have a role in compelling the “DM Entities” to combine their trajectories and create more complex structures.

“planeting”

“DME” is a “volume of concentric trajectories”; seen from outside perspective, it would look like a sort of planetary system. Being so, whenever one or more “DM Entities” integrate in a new form, the new structure cannot be a mere gathering of masses, energies, volumes and others, as the “trajectories” do not envelop one another, but they integrate with each other; as a result we cannot asses these structures through known mathematical functions. But because it results from an arrangement similar with a planetary one, we can call this mathematical function “planeting”, just as we say addition, subtraction and so on, this name being, in my opinion, the most suggestive.

The new structures/”gears” have a planetary elaboration; they are denser or sparsely function of environment but continually structuring. Thus “planeting” as structuring – but also as a mathematical function - is a process, i.e. both the structures and their parameters are dynamic.

the energy of the structures

So “planeting” would be the mathematical function we use to calculate the parameters of the structures. Let’s start with the energy parameter, since it is a special one, and let’s begin from the structuring of two “DM Entities”. For example, two “DM Entities” with compatible resonating offers and evolving relatively close, under “the imperatives” will integrate in a new “gear”. The needs of the existence impose them to split the energy developed at the formation of the “gear” into two functions “SE” and “RE”, and to understand the distribution let’s use an example:

900 grams of uranium look like a piece of matter of few cubic centimetres, which is nice and quiet until we add another 100 grams (thus reaching its critical mass) and unleash a huge explosion, with a volume of several cubic kilometres. This means that our peaceful piece of matter (following a series of internal processes we won’t discuss here) expanded into a huge amount of matter and energy we can’t even fathom.

What actually happened? A huge amount of “DM Entities” was once structured into a piece of uranium including also its tremendous amount of energy. Seeing how peaceful this initial small piece was, we can deduce that most of its energy was concentrated in “structural energy” which does not manifest outside; and as “relational energy” remained only enough energy to give to the piece its form, colour and so on (the amount of radiation is insignificant for our example).

This example is perfect: we can understand “planeting” as the transformation of “the space matter” of a certain number of “DM Entities” into “the mass matter” – the piece of uranium; through explosion, “the mass matter” of the uranium becomes again “the space matter” of the “DM Entities”. The fact that the “mass matter” of uranium had few cc is explained by the fact that the set of trajectories crammed/integrated, thus the whole structure decreased its volume.

We do not know the ratio between these two energies, but if we think about the differences between the peaceful state and the other, we see it can be extremely high.

From the uranium example, we draw some other conclusions too: “SE” or cohesion is the only form of energy storage. From the simplest to the most complex, all structures are solar energy storage, energy stored as “SE”. Water, rocks and others are batteries, all energy stored as “SE”. Now it is obvious that the energies of the structures cannot be added through a simple arithmetic function. Even though their total cannot be higher or lesser than of all “DM Entities” components, the ratio showing the dynamic relationship between the two forms of energy is complicated.

the volume of the structures

Since the trajectories are coupling, the volumes of the structures cannot be a sum of the volumes of the components; so through “planeting” there is a lost on the volume, but a gain in density, i.e. the “space matter” becomes “mass matter” and thus moving from the “rational reality” to “the sensorial reality”, i.e. the world of perceivable objects.

As we see, “matter is not energy with higher speed” (we overcome the confusion between mass and matter), we see that energy doesn’t actually transform into mass, even if moving with square speed of light.

Remember the only matter that can move at the highest possible speed is the matter of “DME” and so “ITS” speed has nothing to do with the speed of light.

Of course the speed of the rope created the mass of the disk, but this experiment was just a suggestion, its practical realization is impossible, since there isn’t any rope to withstand this type of traction, there isn’t any force that can rotate it with the necessary speed, and no environment in which to rotate it without igniting.

As we see, the structure of the matter is not a flat spin of a material particle, but a network of trajectories integrated into a “spatial gear”. Maybe the deeper trajectories of the “gears” have a higher speed that the peripheral ones, their trajectories are similar, but that doesn’t mean that their energy has transformed into matter.

I do not insist on this anymore, but we have to say that the intention to bring harmony between “the rational reality” and “the sensorial reality” without the knowledge of what needs to be harmonized, led to many oddities such as “plastic space” and “elastic time”, as if space and time were material concepts and not conventional concepts.

To conclude, the volumes are planetings of the trajectories of the components.

“the time of the identity” of the structures – “identity time”

After discussing the concept of “planeting”, we should take a closer look at the duration needed to create a structure.

If the volume of a structure isn’t the arithmetic sum of the volumes of its components, neither is “the identity time” the arithmetic sum of their “times”. Because of the misconception we have about time, we are in for a big surprise.

“DM Entities” build their “gear trajectories” in specific intervals of time, but they will do the same when integrated in larger structures, just this time the trajectories will adjust to the other “DM Entities” trajectories. Therefore, the structural time of two or more integrated “DM Entities” cannot be higher, since their processes are simultaneous.

Therefore, since the process of the structuring is simultaneous with the structuring of its components, its “identity time” will be the same.

Surprising conclusion, isn’t it?

Of course we can easily tend to think that “the identity time” of a structure should be higher; since the volume is bigger, we might assume the peripheral trajectories might be longer, and thus take more time to travel.

Let’s not forget the trajectories integrate and there aren’t longer trajectories to surround the whole structure. Every “DME” bounds with the other just like a bee hangs on to another building the beehive, each preserving its identity.

(A/N Now, taking into account all these, the chemical elements from the Periodic Table of Mendeleyev should contain the frequency, waveform, number of “DME”, in fact all the characteristics of the corresponding “gear”.).

The surprise is that the Earth, the Solar System and even the Universe are natural structures, which means that “their identity time” should be the same as the time of their constituent “DM Entities”.

And so they are. We can also compare it with a clock: no matter how big a clock is, “its identity time” is the second, its mechanism must be functional in one second, to be a clock not just a simple mechanism. So every second the whole gear – wheels, levers and rest – must do the whole functional cycle in one second. Therefore the Earth, the Solar System, the Universe are each build entirely as they are in one unit of time.

“the time of the perennity” of the structures - the perennity time

From the above example, we see that clocks build every second their identity and so for the next second and so on until they broke. “Its time is up” they say, or should we say its “perennity” is up.

Same with every other structure: it builds its “identity” in a specific unit of time and so on for the next unit of time and so on until it breaks down and enters another structure.

So the time it remains in the same identity structure will be “The Perennity Time”; this can be a fraction of a second, two centuries, five millennia or even the eternity of the Universe.

Now it should be pointed out something: since the “DM Entities” are eternal things into existence, and so are “the imperatives” acting upon them; so they will exist forever and will keep structuring in different form with different qualities.

To conclude, the duration of every quality represents “its Perennity Time”.

the vibrations of the structures

Obviously, since the “DM Entities” smash into environment sending specific vibrations, so will the structures do; they will be vibratile structures. But because they are larger structures and keep on getting larger through continuous assembling, their vibrations will get lower and lower.

Imagine a structure made up of several “DM Entities”, it will be a “gear with coupled trajectories”, some deeper and some peripheral, with variable shaped volume - due to rotating, swinging, in precession and so on. So the “trajectories” will collide with the environment with a dominant fundamental frequency with maximum amplitude; the set of the “peripheral trajectories”, i.e. the set of the “lumps” randomly appeared, will also collide with the environment and cause a set of harmonics.

However, the dominant fundamental frequency with the maximum amplitude is its “identity vibration”.

I already mentioned that the vibrations of the “DM Entities” are within radiations range; the spectroscopy tells us that all chemical elements of the Periodic Table have their frequencies within this range. So this proves that the structuring from the first step of stabilization are close in size and frequency. (A/N Let’s not mistake the vibrations of the structures with the vibrations of the objects composing those structures; for example, a copper bell at impact emits a vibration, but that vibration is not of the copper element, but the response of the smashed copper quantity returning to the environment the energy received. The vibration of the bell is influenced of course by the type of material composing the bell, but this is something different; the bell vibrates according to its shape and amount of material.)

The structures come in every shape and every density; some are “matter/space” and some are “matter/mass”, but all of them emit vibrations; for example, there are vibrations with specific parameters causing sensations we name heat, light, smell, taste and sound.

So all structures emit vibrations, i.e. have an “identity vibration” through which they manifest their existence onto environment.

There are also those we perceive, but we are not aware of them, so we don’t have specific names for them, but they also are from the radiation range.

the propagation of the structure vibrations

As “DME” doesn’t leave its socket of existence, so do the structures; only their vibrating energy is sent out; they all retain their positions – into the “Solar/stellar Stream” or in their specific environment - so they are not moving to reach our senses, but their vibrations, their vibratile energy travels through environment to stimulate our specific receptors.

So we know them through their vibrations.

the identity time and the perennity time of the universe

Let’s talk a little about the Universe and its “identity time”. According to the logic the Universe is the result of the integration of all “DM Entities” and its structures; it’s the structure with the largest volume so it will vibrate with the lowest vibration above “0”.

Because we are integrated in it and part of its dynamics, we cannot perceive its fundamental vibration, only some of these harmonics, like an undefined internal buzz. We established that the Universe is a full body, an ordered structure (cosmos), the “largest” structure (A/N I use quotes for the reasons we discussed in the subchapter Infinite); however, being a thing into existence like any other, the Universe should have specific parameters like the others; only that being also the largest structure, its parameters should be ... proportional; more suitable because the situation is however different from the other structures, because the Universe is not into an environment - it is the environment itself. So overall it is not influenced by the material-energetic transfers from the “stellar streams” (which are part of it); the Universe preserves the same amount of matter. Same amount but not same quality; compelled by “the structuring imperative”, the “DM Entities” keep on structuring and re-structuring, so the Universe stays the same, but always changing.

Therefore, the Universe is eternal, but always different.

“the material unstructuring imperative”

I already said the Universe is an eternal process based on the temporal material eternity of the “Entities” and the “structuring imperative”, but I somewhat ignored the “stellar streams” and their effects. Let’s try to understand now the eternal universal dynamic taking them into account.

From the “temporal/material middle” where we are, we see the multitude of stars unstructuring and at the same time the multitude of planets structuring. We cannot ignore the logical connection between the “stellar waste”, the “planetary greed” and the role “the streams” play in this transfer. I mean we cannot ignore the fact that the stars thrust out matter and the planets accumulate matter through “streams”.

Therefore, we conclude that the Universe is the embodiment of billions of star systems - in fact billions of “stellar processes” - under two imperatives: “the temporal material imperative for harmonic structuring” acting on planets and a counterbalancing one, “the unstructuring imperative” acting on stars. So the stars and the planets are in a permanent transfer relationship of matter and energy through their respective streams. Also, we already know the matter and energy don’t disappear. We will deepen in another chapter the consequences for this dynamic complementarism.

the infinite

Now, time is not something inconceivable anymore (something which runs from minus infinite to plus infinite). It is the product of each material existence; the matter and energy of “Entities” are eternal, so “the perennity time” of the Universe is eternity. Naturally the dimension of eternity, of the infinite stretches out of the reach of our neural capacity, and there is no point in talking about it; there is no point in asking whether there are out there “DME”-s in infinite number to create an infinite space and an infinite time. But we can approach this subject from a different perspective. I already said the Universe is a counterbalancing process between the “structuring imperative” and “unstructuring imperative”. But the stellar systems seem to have different ages and this means they were not born all at the same time and so they won’t be ending up all at the same time either. This being the case, these matter and energy transfers will keep occurring until all stars will become planets.

Of course the “stellar processes” will not stop here; I’ll stop now because some premises/arguments about them should be added; they are additions that I will make in a subsequent chapter.

structures with fragile stability

We already talked about stable things into existence, like “DME”-s and their structures that we consider to be fixed elements from the Periodic Table. The attributes of “DME”-s and of structures depend on the environment and this is continually changing. It means that the stability of the elements from the Periodic Table itself is relative, i.e. with their vibrations between certain limits the resulting structures are relatively stable. There are also structures more unstable and not only because of the environment, but because some specific features; since these structures are in large number and are very important for the existence itself, we must take them into account.

Let’s take a little recap of what we have discussed so far to be better prepared to understand these structures:

- according to “vibratile” parameters, the nature manifests to us - the receivers and investigators - in three realities: first is the “Sensorial Reality” we know through the senses; then the “Rational Reality” we not only intuit, but also know/evaluate using logical thinking; and third, the “Material Reality” also intuitive but at the same time knowable (A/N it can be known), as we improve our means of investigation, and also our perceptual capacities and our awareness.

- In the “Triple Reality Theory”, the fundamental unit of existence is a “dynamic material entity”, “DME”, a “circum-centric spatial gear” of its own trajectories.

- All things into existence are “DM Entities” and structures of “DM Entities”; the perceivable ones we call “mass matter” and belong to “Sensorial Reality”; the ones beyond our perception we call “space matter” and they are from the “Rational Reality”;

- All things into existence are “spatial gears” colliding into the environment with their “trajectories” and causing their “”vibrational identity”; they are known to as through their “vibrations”.

- The vibrations differ in frequency, which is higher that zero and all within radiation range. The vibrations also vary with the waveform, which can have different graphics from horizontal and vertical straights to any curve form.

- The smallest things into existence are the “DM Entities” with their “vibrational identity” with the highest frequency.

- The largest structure into existence is the Universe, the all things into existence “gear” integrating all existing “vibrations”; it has its “vibrational identity” with the lowest frequency.

- All things into existence have a “structuring imperative” compelling them into larger and larger “gears”, thus transforming “space matter” into “mass matter”.

- No thing into existence – “spatial gear” - moves from its existing place; all are known through their “vibrations” (even the plasma from “the Solar Stream”).

So much for now; let’s talk about some particular things into existence whose “vibrations” we perceive, but we are not aware of them.

So we are aware of the things into existence, we identify them by their contours, colours, taste, smell, sound but also there are some beyond our awareness, and we know them through intermediaries. There are many, but we’ll discuss separately the ones called magnetic phenomena, electrical phenomena and catalytic phenomena.

the magnetic phenomenon

We all know about some metallic objects attracting or repelling each other, this phenomenon called magnetism. It was agreed that these events happen due to special molecules – magnetic molecules or magnetic unit, and their attraction or repulsion force derive from some sort of internal bipolar energy; all this according to classical physics, but from the triple reality theory and the “DM entities” point of view, things look very different.

We see that the phenomenon manifests itself in the “rational reality” beyond the reach of our perception, but through our reasoning we didn’t conclude that the energy of the “DME” is bipolar.

It is possible that the “trajectories” of two “DM Entities” – compatible for structuring - take some relatively oriented forms suggesting polarity; but this orientation is momentary, not permanent, and it manifests itself only inside of the structure and not as an attraction, like a magnetic one.

So ephemeral polarizations are possible, but for the magnetic phenomenon to manifest, just the “structuring imperative” is not enough.

Another force is needed, another “imperative”. This force is the terrestrial/solar/universal magnetic field.

The presence of the magnetic force of the terrestrial/solar/universal magnetic field manifests itself into the structures; this means the vibrations of “DM Entities” are compatible with the “vibrations” of the energies we call magnetic.

What would be the difference between regular vibrations and magnetic vibrations? Well, the frequency and the waveform of course, i.e. only the combination of the two dynamics can determine their characteristics.

In this case, “the trajectories of the magnetic vibrations” – since they are also “vibrations”- have some specific particularities, maybe some sort of “warp”; being so, what we call magnetic molecule is nothing else but a “gear” from several “DM Entities” with specific “trajectories” facilitating the manifestation of the magnetic phenomenon.

Let’s analyse in more detail the “magnetic vibration” from the specific example of the iron magnetic property.

We know that there is no such thing like magnetic iron, so this phenomenon doesn’t belong to the iron, it is only associated with it. So the “spatial gear” of the “clean” iron has no magnetism.

We also know that the iron doesn’t become magnetized by altering its chemical structure, i.e. adding or removing something from its structure. But it’s enough to place it in a magnetic field for the “warp of its trajectories” to appear and to temporarily transform it into a magnet. If we remove it from the magnetic field after a while, its “warp” disappear and so its “magnetic vibration”; the iron becomes neutral again; so we conclude that the “magnetic vibration” is temporarily associated with the iron and its “trajectories” develop or are susceptible to develop a specific “warp” only when placed into a magnetic field.

The conclusion would be that materials with magnetic properties are materials with “specific vibrations”, but being close to the “magnetic vibrations” they will interfere with them under the magnetic field action.

We should also underline that the “magnetic vibration” is very sensitive to the material activity (Brownian movement) like thermic activity; this shows that there has to be some sort of compatibilities between them, a “vibratile” resonance.

Or the common phenomenon of the Sun, Earth, Universe, huge generators of magnetic field, is that they have also huge resources for thermic activity.

These manifestations also show that the “material activity” generating “the thermic activity/vibration” also generates “the magnetic activity/vibration” in the compatible materials, “vibrations” with specific parameters, but with frequencies in the radiation range.

the electrical phenomenon

We cannot dissociate the magnetic phenomenon from the thermic phenomenon, but also from the one we call electricity (its name comes from the name of the electron, a particle of the atom – supposedly - responsible for its existence); as the “magnetic vibration” and the “thermic vibration” are caused by the “material activity”, also the “electrical vibration” is produced the same way, so we can place it as part of the general dynamics of vibrations. “The electric vibration”/electric current is artificially created through chemical sources or dynamic using alternators, but there is also a natural electric current generated by Earth.

As I said before, the only ones carrying energy are the “DM Entities”, so the thermic, magnetic and electric phenomena are energetic manifestations generated by their own structures; also being “vibratile energies”, they propagate through structures just like any other radiation. Therefore, just as there is no photon to transport the light, there aren’t any “therm-ons” for heat or “magnet-ons” for magnetism and finally electrons for electricity.

But for an easier understanding of the magnetic and electric phenomena, let’s analyze another phenomenon.

galvanization

The same phenomena in the Solar System happen on a different scale in a galvanizing tank. In short, galvanizing is an electrical/physical/chemical process in which a metal like copper, for example, is deposited on another metal, like iron for example. The procedure goes like this: in a vessel containing a solution of sulphuric acid - called electrolyte - a piece of copper and a piece of iron are sunk together, both connected to a power source of direct current; the copper is connected to the positive electric pole – anode - and the iron is connected to the negative electric pole – cathode. The phenomenon which interests us appears when we close the electric circuit, the copper anode begin to disappear and gradually reappears on the iron cathode, in the exact same amount. Obviously the copper deposited on the cathode is the one from anode, but for it to move, there are 2 necessary conditions, hence the resemblance to the Solar System.

In the case of the electrolytic tank, there is a pole with excess of copper and another one in wanting of it; in the case of the Solar System there is a ”pole” with excess matter, the Sun, and another one in wanting of it, the planets. There is also the electric current – for the tank - and the “Solar Stream” for the Solar System.

There is also another thing - we discussed it above, but now we have the proof - for the “galvanic current” to flow, both anode and cathode must be submerged in the same electrolyte, good conductor of electricity. Same way the Solar System has to have an “electrolyte” containing the Sun and the planets, good conductor for the “Solar Stream”. The proof I was talking about is that the Sun and the planets are all in the same “electrolyte”, same “space matter” good conductor of “solar stream”; so there is any interplanetary vacuum.

So there is this similarity: the Solar “mass matter” – the anode, unstructuring in “space matter” – the electrolyte, “The Solar Stream” – the galvanic current, transporting the matter and energy – the copper, to the planets – the cathode, where is restored in “mass matter”.

We also see it in the way both currents, The Solar Stream and the electrical current, are generated; both are the result of the unstructuring of the “mass matter” in chemical sources and the unstructuring of the “mass matter” in the Sun, i.e. the transformation of “structural energy” into “relational energy”.

Understanding these similarities is a big step for the understanding of the universe.

the electromagnetism

The electromagnetic phenomenon is also generated by “the imperative for harmonic structuring” and “the Solar Stream Imperative”; it is not due to the natural “material activity” – like the terrestrial magnetic field producing magnetism, but to an artificial one caused by the electric current, itself an artificial product. Of course the natural magnetic field – terrestrial, Solar, universal – is involved, being everywhere and anytime, but the force of the electric current is preponderant. Thus the “electromagnetism” is an artificial product.

There is also natural electromagnetism, produced by natural electric current (mentioned above), but we will get into details when we talk about Earth; now let’s talk about particular manifestation of energy.

capacitors and electrets

As I mentioned above, the only artificial way to store/deposit energy is to transfer it from “RE” - “where it dissipates” – into “SE” where it is preserved, i.e. to concentrate “the trajectories” in more complex structures – see the manifestation of uranium.

There is another way to store energy also through the “cramming” of “trajectories” into structures, but much simpler than the enrichment of the uranium - since they are build through simpler methods: the capacitors and electrets.

Let’s talk first about the electrets; their production will help us to better understand the process of storing the energy into capacitors. So the electrets are dielectric materials (electrically non conductive); they are melt and placed into a strong electric field until cooling and solidifying. After solidification, the dielectric mass remains polarized as it was in the generating field: the part polarized with plus keeps the positive polarization, and the part polarized with minus keeps the negative polarization. If we put them in contact through a wire/conductor - an electric current will flow through them. This is the evidence that the energy was stored in the electret /dielectric, i.e. the dynamic “RE” was stored as “static” “SE”.

The process is identical for the electric capacitors, the difference is that they being permanently in electric circuit the loading/storing and the unloading/ power draining of the dielectric are in rapid succession. (A/N As we notice, the name capacitor is not really suitable, it acts more like a storing element; we should avoid confusion with condensation, which is a different process).

energy storing elements

Of course, in addition to capacitors and electrets, also the magnets are storing energy like the enriched uranium. So there are countless possibilities of energy storing, which only prove that the real energy deposit is “SE”.

the catalytic phenomenon

Let’s talk now about a mysterious phenomenon called catalytic, also characteristic for the “unsaturated structures”.

Remember that some chemical reactions cannot take place without the presence of a witness, called catalyst; this element, present in the solution, may participate in multiple chemical transformations, but it is not consumed by the reaction itself. Remarkable is that catalysts are those substances usually very stable, like metals for example.

The question is: what is its particular feature; how the “trajectories” of the catalysts look like, more accurate, how come they can influence the “gears” of another structures without “clinging” on them? It means their trajectories participate in the respective structuring and somehow once the new structure is done, they are able to maintain intact without “wrinkles” their own structure?

Hard to believe; but if we imagine both the catalyst and the catalyzed substances as not perfect stable structures - as we consider, with a finer instability manifesting only in certain circumstances, like catalytic structuring, it also means their trajectories present some peculiarities. Anyway, it seems that the trajectories of the catalyzed structure also keep some of those peculiarities and so manifest some instability. So, in appropriate circumstances, between catalysts and catalysed substances manifests a fine complementarism.

The important thing is that it reveals a very important phenomenon: some apparently stable structures are not in perfect structural balance, they are not perfectly satisfied, i.e. their “gears” present fine availabilities for association/ hooking; this type of structures are the “unsaturated structures”.

unsaturated structures.

All structures are “spatial gears” harmonically assembled, so we could call them also “harmonic structures”. But seeing the magnetic phenomena, the electric and especially catalytic phenomena, we can deduct there are structures presenting availabilities for structuring - in minus or plus; we could call these structures “unsaturated”, because their “gears” are not perfectly satisfied. Since absolutely all structures are “vibrations”, the differences between them must necessarily be of frequency and form of trajectories, apropos of the “warp” we discussed about.

Let’s take the iron example: as I said, there is no such thing like magnetic iron, which means that the “spatial gear” of the “clean” iron does not manifest a magnetic phenomenon. It cannot be chemically induced, since there isn’t a “magnetic substance” that mixed with the iron will produce magnetic iron. But placed into a “magnetic current”, the “DM Entities” structured as iron are oriented with the magnetic field and the iron becomes magnet.

Same happens with the catalytic phenomenon; there is not a “catalytic substance” which mixed with a given structure transforms it in a catalyzed one; but there are structures with their trajectories presenting some particularities that resonate with those of the catalysers, thus helping to the structuring.

No doubt, there are no mysteries: all these phenomena, electric, magnetic, catalytic, and others are just “vibrations”, like any other.

They differ by frequency, of course, but they manifest particular characteristics, which I believe are caused by these “warps” of their trajectories.

How come they acquired this particularity? Since there is infinity of “DM Entities” and consequently an infinite diversity of the environment, it’s only natural to have all possible particularities in it. Therefore, although the “imperative for structuring” demands harmonic structuring, because of various environmental conditions there is possible for relatively unstable “gears” to form; I call them “Unsaturated Structures”.

There is no contradiction: “the harmonic imperative for structuring” demands harmonic structuring but – as early investigators concluded, all the states are actually processes that can take up to a Pico fraction of time or a second, a minute, a year, a millennium.... So the STRUCTURING LAW is implacable, but being also a process, it manifests in different forms as the moments differ. Thus, all the processes we call iron, copper, magnetism, unsaturating, electricity and so on, are actually certain moments observed as they unfold. Some are maybe stable, but there are maybe some who at this point are only in a certain stage of this unfolding process called their “temporal, material” existence.

I will stop here, because if I go further I will step too far into the realm of assumptions and our knowledge so far is too limited. Still a question remains: are there many “unsaturated structures”? Well, if we think at the infinite movement of the Universe caused by its permanent re-arranging, we can conclude that the number of the “unsaturated structures” is higher than of the fix structures. After all, they are the most dynamic structures or, better said, they are permanently dynamic structures.

Therefore the “unsaturated phenomenon” exists, as the above phenomena prove it, and must be taken into account as part of the Universe process.

separate notes

- About the “plastic/elastic space” we talked in the example of “the disk experiment”; it showed that the rotation of the rope does not create matter, but the impression of matter, impression we call mass, but that doesn’t mean that in the experiment the mass of the rope is plastic/elastic and has the ability to stretch and become a disk;

- Same with time; the time also is not plastic/elastic, and for a better understanding let’s imagine the following experiment: we are on the ground with a watch emitting a sound signal at every second; we have another watch in a rocket which can travel almost with the speed of light and is emitting its sound signal through a radio. So when the rocket starts, we can hear both signals at the same time, one from the ground and the other through radio; but the next second we hear only the signal from the present watch, since the watch from the rocket is now almost 300000 km away and we will hear its signal almost a second late, since the sound need to travel back to where we are, meaning 2 seconds. And so it will happen with the next seconds, the third second of the watch in the rocket we will hear it after 6 seconds, since the vehicle is now at 600000 km away and also has to travel back.

The above confusion might create the illusion that time expands or contracts, but this cannot be true. So the time for a moving vehicle with the speed of light it is not longer or shorter but the duration of the processes of its mechanisms.

- Among specialists, there is a joke more in jest or in earnest, as a question: is it heavier a windup clock or a not windup clock, since the windup clock contains more energy? “Across the frontiers”- by Werner Heisenberg, Political Publishing, 1977, Bucharest.

Now we understood; the energy is not matter, but a manifestation of it, so it cannot be weight, but the matter that holds it. In this case however, more in jest or in earnest, we can say that by tensing the clock spring the used energy is equal with the resulting energy from freeing the clock spring; there is no difference between them.

.......................................................................................................

A/N Since the publishing houses require the exclusivity of the works, I upload on this blog only an excerpt from the book: for the entire book please just send me an email at vasile.gaja@gmail.com.

CHAPTER IV

the process universe: structuring - unstructuring

- transformation of “mass/matter” into “space/matter”

…………………………………………………………..

- transformation of “space/matter” into “mass/matter”

…………………………………………………………..

- movement and pressure of the “solar stream”

…………………………………………………………..

- movement of the solar wind

…………………………………………………………..

- propagation of the “solar current”

…………………………………………………………..

- the red shift

…………………………………………………………..

- crossing areas of the stellar systems

…………………………………………………………..

- “material chaos zones”

…………………………………………………………..

- “isolation zones”

…………………………………………………………..

- “zones of structuring”

…………………………………………………………..

- formation of planets

…………………………………………………………..

- gravity

[...] Well, we already know a similar phenomenon we call gravitational attraction, considered a sort of wave of attraction between masses. But now, when we know the mass is just a level of perception and nothing more, and also that the matter does not emit such waves, therefore the gravitational attraction cannot be the result of attraction between masses; so we understand that the gravitational attraction is the combined effect of the “stellar/Solar streams” dynamics and the “planetary sips”. The conclusion is important: it means that the Gravitational Attraction is present all over the Universe and there is no such thing like absolute imponderability; that which we consider to be imponderability is only a result of gravitational currents and anti-currents cancelling each other. Hence, as the maritime and atmospheric currents, the gravitational currents move like any other fluid.

So the gravity phenomenon described as a result between the “streams” and “planetary sips” can be relatively easy verified and proved: weighting of the same object in the middle of a reflecting ocean – like for example the Jarvis Island (USA) in the Pacific Ocean right on the Equator, and then in the Amazon Forest at the same altitude, same moment of the day and same tidal moment, it will show a weight difference; fine equipment will show that the same object will weight more in the jungle than in the middle of the ocean, thus proving the effect of the Sun on the gravity and also the confusion between mass and weight. [...].

- weight

…………………………………………………………..

- solar/stellar gravity

…………………………………………………………..

- moon

…………………………………………………………..

- volcanoes, earthquakes

…………………………………………………………..

- rotation of planets and the continental drift

…………………………………………………………..

- formation of stellar systems

…………………………………………………………..

CHAPTER V.

terrestrial energy

- lithospere

…………………………………………………………..

- atmosphere

…………………………………………………………..

- hydrosphere

…………………………………………………………..

- biosphere

- Photosynthesis

…………………………………………………………..

- Thermo-synthesis

…………………………………………………………..

- Fossil-sphere

…………………………………………………………..

- centrosphere

…………………………………………………………..

CHAPTER VI.

earth, matter and energy processing organism

- earth - consumer and processor

…………………………………………………………..

- human being

…………………………………………………………..

- “the civilization process”

…………………………………………………………..

- vulnerable terra

…………………………………………………………..

- what to do

…………………………………………………………..

THE END

Vasile Gaja

Despre mine

joi, 30 mai 2013

Right About When... The End Of Our World? Part I: Fizis - The Material World

VASILE GAJA